Get the Facts
It's important to us that you have the FACTS!
Question: Is
the reason Developers Diversified Realty is using the initiative
process because DDR lost their majority on the Board of Supervisors
so now they want to try an end run around good planning and
the democratically elected representatives we chose to serve
us as Mendocino County Supervisors?
Answer: No. To make a claim that DDR is
somehow, all of a sudden, doing an end run around elected
officials is absurd. DDR attempted no less than 3 times to
process its project through the normal public hearing process
and could not even get it done when it had an apparent 3-2
vote in favor. It is obvious now that the county’s
inability to move land use legislation, namely the UVAP,
through this process gives DDR no hope of ever getting a
vote through the “normal” process. Many citizens
agreed and urged DDR to take the land use and zoning legislation
to the people to decide.
Question: Some are
saying that the DDR initiative is a bold and total usurpation
of all local government authority and local government planning. And
it allows a Mega-Mall even larger than originally suggested
by DDR when it first acquired the Masonite Site. Is this
true?
Answer: No. As stated
above DDR made several attempts at submitting applications
and the county has not demonstrated it has the ability
to complete any type of “local land use planning”.
The original 2005 application proposed 695,253 square feet
of all retail uses. The preferred schematic alternate in
the specific plan has 598,325 square feet of retail uses
and 158,800 square feet of non-retail uses including 26
units of residential, 37 Live-work units and a hotel. This
plan represents 21% coverage of the site meaning 79% of
the site will not be occupied by buildings.
Question: Is
it true that if passed the initiative will become law without
any environmental review of any of DDR’s plans.
Answer: State law exempts land use legislation,
which is approved by initiative, from review under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As stated before DDR tried
numerous times without success to submit an application and
have the county act as lead agency during an EIR process
that DDR would have funded. Knowing that the initiative process
was exempt from CEQA, DDR went ahead and had many technical
studies prepared and included mitigation measures in the
specific plan even though they were not required (See
Appendix B of Specific Plan).
DDR has had more public input on this project than would
normally be found in any project of this size. DDR sought out,
on its own, input from many groups and individuals in the Ukiah
Valley. In 2007 alone over 20 facilitated listening sessions
were held, without DDR representatives attending, where the
facilitator was able to move the debate from a stated “position” about
the project (which is normally all you get in a public hearing
process) to a very productive discussion on the wants and needs
of the community. As a result of these meetings DDR was able
to distill the input down into seven distinct common interests.
The designers, local firm Ruff + Associates, developed several
alternatives for the site using those seven common interests
as the guiding principals of the design. These conceptual alternatives
were then presented to the public in March of 2008 during 3
separate meetings advertised as community forums. Attendance
at each of these forums averaged 100 people. The design, as
illustrated conceptually today, in the specific plan is a far
cry from the “retail only” plan proposed in 2005
and is a direct result of the community input DDR sought out
and obtained. Also DDR has committed to using solar technology
and other green techniques in the specific plan area as a result
of this input.
Question: Will traffic
be unbearable?
Answer: No. As a part of preparing
the specific plan DDR prepared extensive traffic
models with scoping input from Caltrans, MCOG
and MDOT. As
a result, measures were developed that mitigate the traffic impacts discovered
in the studies. The mitigation measures can be found
in Appendix
B of the Specific Plan and are required before
any development can open.
Alternate modes of transportation will also be incorporated
into the site to lessen the dependence on automobiles. The
specific
plan allows for the possibility of a new mass transit
center for the Mendocino Transit Authority, new bus routes
through the site, and an interconnected system of bicycle and
pedestrian paths.
Question: Will Mendocino
Crossings be a 800,000 square foot “mega-mall”?
Answer: No. Mendocino
Crossings will not be a mega-mall.
It will be a mixed-use, environmentally
sensitive, open-air development.
The proposed specific plan allows for a mix
of retail, multifamily residential, entertainment
uses and light industrial.
Question: Does the Ukiah Valley really need
additional retail?
Answer: Yes. Independent economic analyses
confirm what many residents already know: Residents shop in
Santa Rosa and at other locations outside of the county. Approximately
$169 million dollars in retail sales is currently “leaking” from
Mendocino County and this figure does not take into account
the costs associated with gasoline or the impact on the environment
from cars traveling many miles to reach shopping locations.
To confirm the magnitude of retail leakage from Mendocino
County, Costco indicated that Mendocino County residents are
spending $50 million dollars at their store in Santa Rosa.
This leakage figure makes it clear why Costco has made an effort,
for over five years, to find a suitable location in the Ukiah
area.
Question: Did Developers Diversified
Realty steal the Costco deal from the city?
Answer: No.
Costco approached Developers
Diversified Realty after they
were unsuccessful in their negotiations
with Ukiah. Costco has considered
several properties in the region
and found that the former Masonite
site is ideal for a Costco store. They also discovered
that if they located at the Mendocino Crossings site the use
of public subsidies would not be required as they would have
been at the Ukiah airport site.
Question: Can a mixed-use
retail center provide well paying jobs?
Answer: Yes. Mendocino Crossings will create
an estimated 700 new jobs at various wage levels, plus potentially
several hundred additional jobs during construction. Many of
these jobs will be living wage positions that will include
health and other benefits.
Question: Does the Ukiah Valley have a shortage
of industrially zoned land?
Answer: No. Allegations that
there is a shortage of industrial land are completely false.
Approximately 346 acres of industrial-zoned land will still
exist in the County after Developers Diversified Realty's property
is developed. The former Masonite site is zoned for heavy,
rather than light industrial use, which is arguably inappropriate
for a location close to residences and the Ukiah urban core.
Heavy industrial uses are not appropriate gateways to a community,
thus arguing for a lighter, more site-sensitive use. Developers
Diversified Realty intends to incorporate light industrial
uses on the site, including live-work units.
Question: Will the development
project drain Ukiah's water resources?
Answer: No. The source of
water for the development is unregulated ground
water in a well that is privately owned by
Developers Diversified Realty. It will not
impact other regulated water sources in the
Ukiah Valley.
Question: Will Ukiah
fund services for the new development, yet not receive
associated tax revenue?
Answer: The County, rather
than the City, would see increased tax revenue,
even though the City may provide public services.
For this reason Developers Diversified Realty
encourages a tax-sharing agreement between the City and County.
Additionally, since the project site is within the County's
redevelopment area, there is great potential to create a sizable
redevelopment fund from the increased tax increment.
Furthermore, both on and offsite infrastructure improvements
for the development would be paid for by the shopping center's
tenants, utilizing a special bond. Therefore, the improvements
will not be a financial burden on area taxpayers.
Question: Will this retail
center look and feel like retail developments
found in cities throughout the region?
Answer: No. This mixed-use
development will be uniquely designed for Mendocino
County and blend seamlessly into the Ukiah
area. The mixed-use nature of the site will
include residential (live-work, apartments, and/or residential
over retail), commercial (restaurants and retailers), light
industrial (live-work, potential adjacent 40 acres), and public
uses (mass transit center, community plaza, community center,
parks and gardens, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and a potential
new railroad depot).
Additionally, this project will be the first solar-powered
mixed-use development in the County. Other environmentally
sensitive technologies are planned as well, such as a variety
of pedestrian-oriented amenities, connections, and walks.
|